Posts Tagged ‘FAA’

Lawmakers Trade Blame for FAA Shutdown

Wednesday, August 3rd, 2011

Congress moved no closer to ending a partial shutdown of the Federal Aviation Administration on Wednesday, with frustrations boiling over from the White House to the Capitol and the majority of lawmakers away on August recess.

The finger-pointing — by Senate Democrats, House Republicans and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood — played out like a bizarre epilogue to a months-long, sometimes vitriolic debate over extending the nation’s debt ceiling. At a news conference Wednesday, Senate Democrats bemoaned being “held hostage” by House Republicans in the standoff over extending the FAA’s authorization, which expired July 22.

The Democrats accused House Republicans of promoting special interests over nearly 4,000 furloughed FAA employees, and the media availability ended awkwardly after a television reporter asked a series of pointed questions as to why the Senate wouldn’t simply pass a bill that has already made its way through the House.

“It’s as if someone puts a gun to your head and says, ‘Give me your money,’ and then you say, ‘Why won’t you give them their money?’ You leave out the whole context that there’s a gun being held to your head, and that is not fair and that is not right. And yet … we keep getting that situation,” Senate Democratic Conference Vice Chairman Charles Schumer (N.Y.) said shortly before all but one lawmaker stormed off stage.

The impasse has resulted in a nearly two-week partial shutdown that has also halted about 70,000 construction jobs across the country. It centers on a House-passed, multiyear reauthorization that would make it harder for airline and railroad workers to unionize, a nonstarter for Senate Democrats. Just two days before the current authorization’s expiration, the House passed another extension that would last only through Sept. 16. It left out the union language, but included $16.5 million in cuts to a rural air service program that would fall heavily on Nevada, the home state of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D).

Republicans say that they’ve sent a reasonable bill to the Senate and that Democrats, who are seeking a “clean” extension, are the ones perpetuating the shutdown.

If no extension is passed until Congress returns in September, the government could lose up to $1 billion in uncollected airline ticket taxes, according to the Transportation Department.

From the White House briefing room Wednesday, LaHood called on Congress to return to work and pass a clean extension. Both the House and Senate will have multiple pro forma sessions during the August recess, meaning they could approve the extension by unanimous consent during the recess, send it to President Barack Obama’s desk and end the standoff.

“Congress needs to come back, resolve their differences, compromise and put our friends and neighbors and colleagues back to work. They should not leave 74,000 people hanging out there without jobs, without a paycheck until September,” said LaHood, who formerly served as a Republican House Member from Illinois. “For Members of Congress to give speeches about jobs and then go on their vacations while construction workers have vacated their jobs rings very hollow.”

Senators have tried multiple times this week to pass an extension by unanimous consent. On Monday, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) blocked an attempt to pass an amended version of the short-term House bill that was supported by Commerce Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and ranking member Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas). The next day, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) tried to pass a clean extension of the FAA authorization, but she ran into an objection from Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.). He then offered his own unanimous consent agreement to pass the unchanged short-term House bill, only to be blocked by Boxer.

Reid had indicated Tuesday that he would be open to accepting the rural air service cuts and passing the short-term bill to tide over the FAA until Congress reconvenes. But by Wednesday afternoon he was insisting that Speaker John Boehner approve a clean short-term extension as soon as possible.

“We must resolve our differences through the normal legislative process. In the meantime, we need a clean, short-term extension to get these people back to work,” Reid wrote in a letter to the Ohio Republican.

House Republicans, including Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman John Mica (R-Fla.), were quick to point out that Rockefeller and Reid have a home-state interest in the authorization standoff, and particularly in the rural air service issue. The Essential Air Service program provides subsidized air travel to rural communities, including in West Virginia and Nevada.

“Powerful Senate Democrats have chosen to protect an airline ticket subsidy program on the backs of thousands of FAA employees and airport construction workers. Now they plan to engage in a personal and political media bludgeoning of folks who disagree with them,” Mica said in a statement Wednesday.

Boehner dug in further.

“The only reason so many jobs are at stake is Senate Democratic leaders chose to play politics rather than pass the House bill,” Boehner said Wednesday. “I respect the fact that Senators have certain objections, but they have had two weeks to respond to the House bill and done nothing, leaving tens of thousands of workers in limbo.”

The Senate and its leaders have been consumed over the past two weeks by negotiations to raise the debt ceiling and reduce the deficit before Tuesday, when the nation was projected to default on its loans. The House passed the final deal Monday evening, then promptly left for recess, with the Senate following suit the next day.

White House press secretary Jay Carney repeatedly expressed the administration’s frustration with Congress — not a particular party — and the impasse that is keeping 74,000 people out of work nationwide. But his cool demeanor stood in stark contrast to LaHood’s angry demand that lawmakers get their acts together and pass something.

“Congress should have passed a clean bill, could have passed a clean bill; I urged them to pass a clean bill,” LaHood said. “They can still do it. Congress can still do it.”

FAA bill full of politics as usual

Wednesday, February 9th, 2011

Earmarks might be on the outs in Washington, but the first bill on the Senate floor since Democrats reluctantly embraced an earmark ban is still chock-full of expensive aviation pet projects that lawmakers are eager to defend for their voters back home.

Tucked inside a current draft of a bill to fund Federal Aviation Administration programs are legislative line items that would direct money to state-specific projects and programs, including $12 million to subsidize flights to 44 rural communities in Alaska, a land transfer for a new airport in Nevada and new airspace testing sites likely in Oregon.

While the line items don’t fit the strict definition of appropriations earmarks, the FAA bill shows how the deft use of legislative language by senators can accomplish the same thing — making sure their home states are taken care of with special projects. Critics call these backdoor earmarks, while defenders say they’re not violating the rules of the ban and are doing an important part of a senator’s job.

Last week, the Senate barred earmarks from spending bills that wind through the Appropriations Committee, but the scramble to keep sending money home raises the question of what is — and isn’t — an earmark.

“The earmark ban is only, as I understand, for the appropriations bills,” Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) told POLITICO. “There are probably, I haven’t looked, there are half a dozen earmarks in this [FAA] bill that we’re on now.”

Longtime earmark critic Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) filed an amendment to the aviation bill that would cut a $200 million fund that covers the $12 million subsidy for 44 Alaska airports.

“The amendment would save $200 million or more by ending subsidies to airlines that serve small airports when there isn’t the market need or volume of consumers,” said McCain spokeswoman Brooke Buchanan.

In a letter to McCain, Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska) urged him to withdraw his proposal, saying the funds are necessary for poor communities that are reachable only by airplane.

“Debating project-specific funding is healthy and necessary,” said Julie Hasquet, a spokeswoman for Begich. “But a program like [Essential Air Service] — which is part of a lifeline in many parts of Alaska — needs to be preserved.”

There’s even a nice benefit in the aviation bill for Nevada, Majority Leader Harry Reid’s home state. The bill includes a federal land transfer around the construction site of a second airport near Las Vegas.

“The FAA legislation allows Ivanpah Airport to plan for the future by utilizing some of its surrounding land to construct flood-control facilities to prepare for a 100-year flood,” Reid spokesman Zac Petkanas said, defending the tailored project.

Reid initially sparred with President Barack Obama over his calls for an earmark ban during the State of the Union, telling the president to “back off.” Last week, Reid agreed to abide by the ban on earmarks in spending bills.